TestiphAI
Dashboard Documents Reports Key Findings Experts Ask AI Timeline Tools Downloads Settings
Rose v. Donald Durham Co.
Trial: April 6, 2026
--
External Research
--
Cross-Case Discoveries
--
Case File Analysis
Ask AI
Ask questions about the case intelligence. Search across all findings, reports, and expert profiles.
Start Chat
Key Findings
Loading findings across categories...
View All
Expert Intel
Loading expert profiles...
View All
Expert Comparison Mediation Prep Depo Prep Case Timeline
--d Trial — April 6, 2026
--d Calendar Call — March 26
--d Mediation — March 20
Executive Summary

Rose (Lively as PR) v. Donald Durham Company is a mesothelioma case pending in the 11th Judicial Circuit, Miami-Dade County, Florida (Case No. 2024-004192-CA-01). Plaintiff alleges exposure to asbestos through Rock Hard Water Putty — a product containing 78.6% plite, 12.5% talc, 8.7% starch, and 0.2% coloring. Trial is scheduled for April 6–24, 2026, with Calendar Call on March 26 and Mediation on March 20.

CMBG3 Law's intelligence operation has produced 87 analytical reports and cross-examination scripts identifying critical weaknesses across 13 plaintiff experts. Our analysis spans product identification, exposure modeling, epidemiology, pathology, and regulatory history.

Key vulnerabilities identified: Dr. Compton's fiber classification shows 0/33 particles meeting asbestiform criteria (KF-197), his own boss called the particles "essentially a brick" (KF-318). Dr. Frank's "each and every fiber" causation theory lacks scientific support. Dr. Markowitz's claimed independence is contradicted by litigation-dependent income. The defense case is anchored by 5 expert witnesses (McNamee, Dotson, Weill, Lindhart, Tenenbaum).

Recent Activity
Loading activity feed...
Intelligence Reports
Loading reports...
Ask Vera
Vera